A · Functional Contract Executive Summary

ContractScopeDeviation = 0. No ninth contract was created; no candidate capability required one.

Assist a field user in resolving a physical position into a candidate canonical Location, and record the human confirmation that binds work to that Location.

Retrieve controlled documents relevant to the operational context and present them with full source, revision and applicability semantics intact.

Orchestrate the pre-start preventive item set for a job card without collapsing the independent state of any item.

Record who is actually present for the task and bind each person to governed role, competency, training and fitness decision facts — without replicating HR, medical or training systems.

Establish IPERC Continuo as a first-class governed record in which system prepopulation, field observation, human confirmation, supervisory review and authorization are distinct and separately attributable.

Compare the expected operational context with the observed field context and determine whether reassessment is required.

Establish tool readiness as a governed capability distinct from equipment readiness, based on physical verification rather than list presence.

Define the functional assurance contract that binds identity, authority, content and version at the moment of signing — without selecting technology or asserting legal validity.

Every contract defines an idempotency key so repeated external triggers cannot duplicate package items, signatures, approvals or operational events, nor silently change state.

OrphanedCapabilities = 0.

No open dependency has been converted into a design assumption. Where owner validation is absent, the contract records the gap and fails closed rather than adopting a default.

All eight contracts satisfy the mandatory 38-element schema; state, authority, source, failure, concurrency, idempotency, provenance and acceptance-predicate elements are defined for every contract. Residual semantic ambiguity (10 items) is registered as open dependency, not as a definition gap masked by an assumption.

Definition is not acceptance. This contract set was subsequently assured and frozen under PH6A-FPSO-FCA-REV0 (gate G-FPSO-03) — see the assurance sections below.

The eight descendant contracts are semantically closed after 9 controlled corrections. All internal semantic ambiguity is resolved; every remaining open item is a genuinely external owner decision that cannot be closed by design and does not make contract behaviour indeterminate. The set is fit to become Requirements of Record for implementation.

This is not an unconditional PASS: 12 external validation dependencies remain controlled-open and no operational evidence exists. Freeze governs specification, not readiness.

INPUT_INTEGRITY = ACCEPTED_FOR_ASSURANCE. Prompt 1 self-reported completeness was recounted from the definition module rather than trusted; recounted values govern where they differ from the reported figures.

Corrected during assurance: 9 · resolved by existing contract: 1 · blocking: 0 · OpenSemanticAmbiguityCount_at_Freeze = 0.

Every dependency satisfies §5: behaviour deterministic, no authority assumed, no source authority assumed, no state meaning contingent on an unknown decision, failure behaviour defined, acceptance boundary defined. CurrentAssumption = NONE for all twelve; no temporary assumption was invented to enable freeze.

States were neither added nor removed to influence counts; only semantic duplication and behavioural ambiguity were corrected.

No state is reachable through an undefined transition, and no material transition is executable because a presentation layer permits it — every material transition names its DecisionRight, reason code and emitted event.

Identity ≠ Role ≠ Permission ≠ Competency ≠ DecisionRight — preserved across all eight contracts. AuthorityContradictions = 0.

TechnologyFailure ≠ AutomaticControlFailure and TechnologyFailure ≠ PermissionToBypassControl. Degradation narrows what may be decided; it never widens it.

Removing all advisory output changes no material decision outcome; advisory output is excluded from the deterministic fact set by the AI-to-Rule firewall (PH6A-AHP-REV1.1).

Same Authoritative/Federated Facts + Same RuleVersions + Same Configuration + Same DecisionRights ⇒ Same Material Decision.

Determinism = PRESERVED

Events are immutable records of occurrence, not state. No consumer derives current state by replaying UI events alone.

AIA Capability → Contract → Parent Contract → Rule/Configuration → Acceptance Predicate

These results do not constitute OPERATIONAL_EVIDENCE, DEMO_EVIDENCE, OPERATIONAL_CLOSURE_EVIDENCE. Simulation, prototype behaviour and operational evidence remain explicitly out of scope.

10/10 findings closed · 37 regression executions.

Future UX and software implementation may consume these contracts; they may not silently redefine them. Registered as descendant provenance of PH6A-IADA-REV1; TechnicalAttribution and DesignProvenanceLineage preserved; no parent mutation.

All contract semantics are closed: OpenSemanticAmbiguityCount = 0, ContractDefinitionGaps = 0, no critical or uncontrolled high defect, no reachable illegal material state, determinism, AI containment, provenance and traceability preserved, parent baseline unchanged. The 12 remaining items are genuinely external owner decisions satisfying every §5 test, each with CurrentAssumption = NONE.