PH6A-FPSO-FPD-REV0
Final Prompt D — Operational Risk Closure, Control Validation & Pilot Assurance
Close operational risk with evidence — authorize pilot only when control, authority and source predicates are defendible. Design containment is not risk reduction, and simulation evidence never becomes operational closure.
OPERATIONAL RISK CLOSURE DEFINED EVIDENCE PENDING PILOT NOT AUTHORIZEDG-PH6A HOLDPILOT NOT AUTHORIZEDG-FPSO-09 NOT EVALUABLEBLOCKING BCs 9EXT 18
A. Operational Risk Closure — Executive View
Non-compensated; no aggregate risk index
Operational exposure
19 material risks reconciled; 5 critical and 10 high residual
Control design
Every risk has a preventive and detective control; 0 risks without control
Dominant systemic gap
18 controls consume facts from an unvalidated source authority
Evidence position
0 OperationalClosureEvidence items admitted; 9 blocking conditions unchanged
Measurement
BC-09 design defined, collection not started, time-irreversibility protection ACTIVE
Decision
G-PH6A HOLD — hard stop; controlled pilot not authorized; G-FPSO-09 not evaluable
§0. Entry Condition — independently reconstructed
14/14 PASS
| Check | Asserted | Observed | Verdict |
|---|---|---|---|
| MACRO_PROMPT_C | CORPORATE_HANDOVER_READY_OPERATIONAL_EVIDENCE_PENDING | CORPORATE_HANDOVER_READY_OPERATIONAL_EVIDENCE_PENDING | PASS |
| MacroID | PH6A-FPSO-MPC-REV0 | PH6A-FPSO-MPC-REV0 | PASS |
| G-FPSO-08 | PASS | PASS | PASS |
| CorporateDevelopmentHandover | READY | READY | PASS |
| G-PH6A | HOLD | HOLD | PASS |
| Phase6A | HOLD | HOLD | PASS |
| ControlledPilot | NOT_AUTHORIZED | NOT_AUTHORIZED | PASS |
| PilotExposure | PROHIBITED | PROHIBITED | PASS |
| OperationalClosureEvidence admitted | 0 | 0 | PASS |
| BlockingBCCount | 9 | 9 | PASS |
| ExternalDependencyCount | 18 | 18 | PASS |
| MaterialFindings | 6 | 6 | PASS |
| CriticalFindings | 2 | 2 | PASS |
| CorporateDecisionRegisterEntries | 12 | 12 | PASS |
§1–§3. Governing configuration, baseline preservation and evidence discipline
Consumed baselines
- PH6A-IADA-REV1
- PH6A-IADA-REV1-SEAL-01
- PH6A-FPSO-FUNCTIONAL-BASELINE-REV1
- PH6A-FPSO-IAD-REV2
- PH6A-FPSO-BAC-REV0
- PH6A-FPSO-APPLICATION-ENGINEERING-BASELINE-REV0
- PH6A-FPSO-DAA-REV0
- PH6A-CORPORATE-DEVELOPMENT-HANDOVER-REV0
- PH6A-FPSO-MASTER-GATE-REGISTER
- PH6A-FPSO-REQUIREMENT-TO-EVIDENCE-CHAIN
- PH6A-FPSO-CORPORATE-DECISION-REGISTER
ArchitectureChange
0
FunctionalBaselineChange
0
Evidence discipline
- SimulationEvidence≠OperationalClosureEvidence
- CorporateHandoverReady≠OwnerValidated
- PrototypeControl≠OperationalControl
- MockSource≠OperationalSource
- TechnicalDesign≠CompetentAuthorityDecision
Governing chain
Risk → FailureMode → Consequence → ControlObjective → DigitalCapability → Authority → Source → Evidence → ClosurePredicate → Gate → ResidualRisk → ValueMechanism
B. Master Risk-Control-Evidence-Value Matrix
19 risks · 13 EVIDENCE_REQUIRED · 6 CONTAINED_NOT_CLOSED · 0 CLOSED
RSK-01TemporalDecoherenceCONTAINED NOT CLOSEDRESIDUAL MEDIUMRiskReduction
Current condition
XR-TEMP-01 implemented and verified in the prototype; EvaluationTimestamp is a governed input.
Failure mode
A material decision consumes a temporally expired fact.
Causal trigger
Validity boundary crossed between evaluation and authorization.
Consequence
Authorization rests on a fact no longer valid.
Operational impact
Work released without a valid precondition.
Governance impact
Decision cannot be defended at audit.
Control objective
No material decision may rely on a temporally expired fact.
Preventive control
Re-evaluation of all temporal facts at decision time.
Detective control
Temporal expiry event forces REASSESS / HOLD.
Digital capability
CAP-21 Temporal governance
Functional contract
XR-TEMP-01 (all FC-FPSO contracts)
Decision right
Supervisor / Permit Authority
Candidate source
Readiness layer clock + source validity dates
Authoritative source status
UNVALIDATED
Required evidence
Owner confirmation of authoritative validity semantics per object.
Evidence ID
EV-RSK-01
Competent authority
Work Control Process Owner
Closure predicate
Validity semantics confirmed per governed object by its process owner.
Affected BC
BC-03
Affected EXT
EXT-05
Affected gate
G-PH6A
Operational measure
Count of decisions blocked by temporal expiry vs decisions taken on expired facts.
Next action
Obtain per-object validity semantics confirmation.
RSK-02RevisionDecoherenceEVIDENCE REQUIREDRESIDUAL HIGHRiskReduction+TimeReduction
Current condition
NoAutomaticRevisionElection preserved; revision election is a human act with recorded basis.
Failure mode
Field executes against a superseded revision.
Causal trigger
Source revision changes after package preparation.
Consequence
Work performed to an invalid method.
Operational impact
Rework, or an unsafe method applied in the field.
Governance impact
Document control chain broken.
Control objective
Executed revision must be the elected, currently effective revision.
Preventive control
Pinned revision snapshot with explicit election.
Detective control
Change detection with materiality assessment.
Digital capability
CAP-03 / CAP-04 Document retrieval and authority
Functional contract
FC-FPSO-02 ContextualDocumentRetrieval
Decision right
Document Controller + Supervisor
Candidate source
Aconex
Authoritative source status
UNVALIDATED
Required evidence
Document-status authority confirmation and extract contract.
Evidence ID
EV-RSK-02
Competent authority
Corporate Document Control Manager
Closure predicate
Named authority confirms revision/status semantics and interface capability.
Affected BC
BC-01
Affected EXT
EXT-01, EXT-02
Affected gate
G-PH6A
Operational measure
Retrieval friction time; count of superseded-revision detections before start.
Next action
Close EXT-01 and EXT-02 with written owner statements.
RSK-03ApplicabilityAmbiguityCONTAINED NOT CLOSEDRESIDUAL MEDIUMRiskReduction
Current condition
SYSTEM_PROPOSED vs HUMAN_CONFIRMED separation enforced; AI cannot write applicability.
Failure mode
A required control is omitted because applicability was inferred, not confirmed.
Causal trigger
Rule proposes applicability that no competent person validates.
Consequence
Missing preventive control at execution.
Operational impact
Exposure to an unmitigated hazard.
Governance impact
Applicability decision without an accountable author.
Control objective
Applicability is only authoritative when human-confirmed.
Preventive control
Human confirmation with recorded evidence metadata.
Detective control
Unconfirmed applicability blocks release (fail closed).
Digital capability
CAP-06 Preventive package composition
Functional contract
FC-FPSO-03 PreStartPreventivePackage
Decision right
Competent Person / Supervisor
Candidate source
Readiness layer (owned)
Authoritative source status
UNVALIDATED
Required evidence
Owner confirmation of the competency profile authorized to confirm applicability.
Evidence ID
EV-RSK-03
Competent authority
ES&H Process Owner
Closure predicate
Authorized confirming roles designated in the decision-rights register.
Affected BC
BC-02
Affected EXT
EXT-04
Affected gate
G-PH6A
Operational measure
Proportion of proposals rejected or amended by the competent person.
Next action
Close EXT-04 decision-rights register.
RSK-04AuthorityLeakageEVIDENCE REQUIREDRESIDUAL CRITICALRiskReduction
Current condition
Permission ≠ Authority enforced; AuthorityResolutionState UNRESOLVED fails closed.
Failure mode
A person with system permission takes a decision they do not hold authority for.
Causal trigger
Authority model absent, so permission is treated as authority.
Consequence
Invalid authorization.
Operational impact
Work released by a non-competent authority.
Governance impact
Decision void; accountability unattributable.
Control objective
No material decision without resolved operational authority.
Preventive control
Attribute-based authority resolution before any material action.
Detective control
Explicit 'no operational authority' state surfaced in UI.
Digital capability
CAP-20 Identity, decision rights and delegation
Functional contract
Authority engine (IADA invariants)
Decision right
Project Director + IAM Owner
Candidate source
Corporate IAM + decision-rights register
Authoritative source status
UNVALIDATED
Required evidence
Signed authority register and IAM integration pattern.
Evidence ID
EV-RSK-04
Competent authority
Project Director
Closure predicate
Authoritative decision-rights register exists and is bound to authenticated identity.
Affected BC
BC-02
Affected EXT
EXT-03, EXT-04
Affected gate
G-PH6A
Operational measure
Count of blocked decisions due to unresolved authority.
Next action
Assign the 6 unassigned material roles; close EXT-03 and EXT-04.
RSK-05DecisionRightExpiryEVIDENCE REQUIREDRESIDUAL HIGHRiskReduction
Current condition
Delegation validity modelled; no delegation source evidenced.
Failure mode
A decision is taken under an expired or revoked delegation.
Causal trigger
Shift change, roster change or delegation window closure.
Consequence
Authorization by an ineligible delegate.
Operational impact
Release invalid at the moment of execution.
Governance impact
Delegation chain unverifiable.
Control objective
Delegation validity is evaluated at decision time, never cached.
Preventive control
Delegation scope evaluated with the temporal rule XR-TEMP-01.
Detective control
No valid delegate → HOLD, never bypass.
Digital capability
CAP-20 Delegation
Functional contract
Authority engine / DelegationRecord
Decision right
Project Director
Candidate source
Corporate IAM / delegation register
Authoritative source status
UNVALIDATED
Required evidence
Delegation governance rule with named owner.
Evidence ID
EV-RSK-05
Competent authority
Project Director
Closure predicate
Delegation register designated and its validity semantics confirmed.
Affected BC
BC-02
Affected EXT
EXT-04
Affected gate
G-PH6A
Operational measure
Count of HOLDs caused by absent valid delegate.
Next action
Issue delegation governance rule.
RSK-06SignatureVersionMismatchEVIDENCE REQUIREDRESIDUAL HIGHGovernanceAssurance
Current condition
SignatureEvidence (immutable) separated from SignatureApplicability (evaluated); EXT-15 open.
Failure mode
A signature is treated as valid for an object version it never covered.
Causal trigger
Object version changes after signature capture, especially offline.
Consequence
Apparent authorization without a real one.
Operational impact
Crew proceeds believing the pre-start is signed.
Governance impact
Evidence appears authoritative but has no identity binding to the current version.
Control objective
Applicability of a signature is recomputed against the current object version.
Preventive control
Version-bound applicability evaluation.
Detective control
Divergence → applicability LOST, decision re-required.
Digital capability
CAP-13 / CAP-15 Signature and offline reconciliation
Functional contract
FC-FPSO-08 DigitalSignatureAssurance
Decision right
Corporate Legal + Work Control Process Owner
Candidate source
Corporate credential / PKI service
Authoritative source status
UNVALIDATED
Required evidence
Credential mechanism approval, legal opinion, offline reconciliation rule.
Evidence ID
EV-RSK-06
Competent authority
Legal Counsel + Corporate Security
Closure predicate
Credential mechanism approved AND offline reconciliation authority defined.
Affected BC
BC-03
Affected EXT
EXT-10, EXT-11, EXT-15
Affected gate
G-PH6A
Operational measure
Count of signatures losing applicability on version change.
Next action
Close EXT-10, EXT-11 and EXT-15.
RSK-07CriticalControlSourceUncertaintyCONTAINED NOT CLOSEDRESIDUAL CRITICALRiskReduction
Current condition
Critical control remains SIMULATED; BC-06 Path A/B undecided.
Failure mode
The only non-compensable ES&H gate is fed by a simulated fact.
Causal trigger
No integration with, or formal rescope of, the critical-control source.
Consequence
A fatal-risk control is presumed present without authoritative verification.
Operational impact
Potential exposure to an unverified fatal-risk control.
Governance impact
The no-compensation rule is defeated at its most material point.
Control objective
Critical-control status must originate from a validated authoritative source.
Preventive control
Simulated critical control is not usable for release.
Detective control
Critical control unverifiable → HOLD.
Digital capability
CAP-17 Critical control
Functional contract
CriticalControl fact contract (IADA)
Decision right
Corporate ES&H
Candidate source
Forwood or designated equivalent
Authoritative source status
UNVALIDATED
Required evidence
Path A integration evidence, or recorded Path B rescope with residual risk.
Evidence ID
EV-RSK-07
Competent authority
Corporate ES&H
Closure predicate
Owner-validated critical-control operating model exists.
Affected BC
BC-06
Affected EXT
EXT-06
Affected gate
G-PH6A
Operational measure
Critical-control verification currency at time of release.
Next action
Take the BC-06 Path A / Path B decision with recorded authority.
RSK-08SIMOPSAggregationCONTAINED NOT CLOSEDRESIDUAL HIGHRiskReduction
Current condition
Compositional SIMOPS model with CUM-1…CUM-7 cumulative rules implemented and tested.
Failure mode
Individually acceptable activities become jointly unacceptable at a shared location.
Causal trigger
Concurrent activities introduced by separate planners.
Consequence
Unassessed cumulative exposure.
Operational impact
Simultaneous incompatible operations.
Governance impact
No single accountable assessor of the aggregate.
Control objective
Cumulative exposure is evaluated at the location, never per job card alone.
Preventive control
Location-level cumulative evaluation before release.
Detective control
SIMOPS conflict → REASSESS or HOLD for all affected cards.
Digital capability
CAP-16 SIMOPS aggregation
Functional contract
SIMOPS compositional model (AHP)
Decision right
Area Superintendent
Candidate source
Readiness layer (owned) + P6 look-ahead
Authoritative source status
UNVALIDATED
Required evidence
Owner confirmation of location-level SIMOPS decision authority.
Evidence ID
EV-RSK-08
Competent authority
Area Superintendent / ES&H
Closure predicate
SIMOPS decision authority named for the pilot location.
Affected BC
BC-04
Affected EXT
EXT-12
Affected gate
G-PH6A
Operational measure
Count of cumulative conflicts detected before start vs in the field.
Next action
Name the SIMOPS decision authority for the pilot location.
RSK-09LocationContextMismatchEVIDENCE REQUIREDRESIDUAL HIGHRiskReduction
Current condition
Location confirmation is a human act; GPS is advisory input only (GPS ≠ Authority).
Failure mode
Crew works under the context of a location they are not at.
Causal trigger
Automatic geolocation election or unverified location change.
Consequence
Wrong hazards, wrong controls, wrong permit context.
Operational impact
Preventive package inapplicable to actual conditions.
Governance impact
Location facts without a steward.
Control objective
Location context is confirmed by an accountable human, never inferred.
Preventive control
Explicit location confirmation with recorded actor.
Detective control
Location replacement invalidates dependent confirmations.
Digital capability
CAP-01 / CAP-02 Location acquisition and context
Functional contract
FC-FPSO-01 LocationAcquisitionService
Decision right
Supervisor + Location Data Steward
Candidate source
Project location register (steward vacant)
Authoritative source status
UNVALIDATED
Required evidence
Named Location data steward acceptance (ADR-14).
Evidence ID
EV-RSK-09
Competent authority
Project Director
Closure predicate
Named steward accepts the terms of reference.
Affected BC
BC-04
Affected EXT
EXT-12
Affected gate
G-PH6A
Operational measure
Count of location replacements and consequent re-confirmations.
Next action
Appoint and record the Location data steward.
RSK-10Crew/CompetencyMismatchEVIDENCE REQUIREDRESIDUAL HIGHRiskReduction
Current condition
Role-slot inheritance and competency validity modelled; source undesignated.
Failure mode
A role is filled by a person without valid competency.
Causal trigger
Late crew substitution or lapsed qualification.
Consequence
Task performed by an unqualified person.
Operational impact
Control executed incorrectly or not at all.
Governance impact
Competency assurance unverifiable.
Control objective
Role assignment requires currently valid competency.
Preventive control
Assignment blocked when competency is unverifiable.
Detective control
Expiry inside the work window triggers REASSESS.
Digital capability
CAP-08 / CAP-09 Competency and fitness
Functional contract
FC-FPSO-04 CrewConfirmationRecord
Decision right
Supervisor
Candidate source
People & Training system (ADR-04 undecided)
Authoritative source status
UNVALIDATED
Required evidence
Competency source designation and interface agreement; privacy-approved fitness fact.
Evidence ID
EV-RSK-10
Competent authority
Training & Competency Manager
Closure predicate
Source designated, interface agreed, privacy approval issued.
Affected BC
BC-01
Affected EXT
EXT-07, EXT-08
Affected gate
G-PH6A
Operational measure
Count of role assignments blocked by invalid competency.
Next action
Close EXT-07 and EXT-08.
RSK-11Tool/EquipmentValidityEVIDENCE REQUIREDRESIDUAL MEDIUMRiskReduction
Current condition
Tool expiry remediated (F-SADR-10); no system of record identified.
Failure mode
A tool with lapsed certification is used on a critical task.
Causal trigger
Certification expiry between issue and use.
Consequence
Equipment failure under load.
Operational impact
Injury or asset damage.
Governance impact
Certification chain unverifiable.
Control objective
Tool validity is evaluated at use time against an authoritative record.
Preventive control
Unverifiable certification → tool unusable.
Detective control
Expiry inside the work window blocks pre-start completion.
Digital capability
CAP-12 Tool readiness
Functional contract
FC-FPSO-07 ToolReadiness
Decision right
Equipment Manager
Candidate source
Equipment/tooling system (unidentified)
Authoritative source status
UNVALIDATED
Required evidence
System identification record with interface capability.
Evidence ID
EV-RSK-11
Competent authority
Equipment Manager
Closure predicate
System identified and interface capability confirmed.
Affected BC
BC-01
Affected EXT
EXT-09
Affected gate
G-PH6A
Operational measure
Count of tools rejected at pre-start for expired certification.
Next action
Close EXT-09.
RSK-12CorporateSourceUnavailableEVIDENCE REQUIREDRESIDUAL HIGHRiskReduction
Current condition
Degraded-source behaviour designed and verified against mock adapters only.
Failure mode
A mandatory fact cannot be obtained and the system compensates.
Causal trigger
Source outage or interface failure.
Consequence
Release on an unverifiable precondition.
Operational impact
Work released without a mandatory control confirmed.
Governance impact
Fail-open behaviour would void the whole readiness claim.
Control objective
Unverifiable mandatory fact → HOLD, never assume.
Preventive control
Dependency classification with fail-closed defaults.
Detective control
SOURCE_UNAVAILABLE state surfaced with owner and impact.
Digital capability
CAP-22 Integration resilience
Functional contract
Adapter contracts (10 mock adapters)
Decision right
Work Control Process Owner
Candidate source
Q4/Engica, Aconex, P6, IAM, competency, tooling
Authoritative source status
UNVALIDATED
Required evidence
Written interface feasibility and availability statements per source.
Evidence ID
EV-RSK-12
Competent authority
Corporate IT + system owners
Closure predicate
Each pilot-scope source confirms availability and degraded-mode expectations.
Affected BC
BC-01
Affected EXT
EXT-01, EXT-05
Affected gate
G-PH6A
Operational measure
Source availability and HOLDs attributable to source outage.
Next action
Obtain per-source availability statements for pilot scope.
RSK-13OfflineReconciliationEVIDENCE REQUIREDRESIDUAL HIGHRiskReduction
Current condition
Event-sourced sync with no Last-Write-Wins; offline signature authority open.
Failure mode
Offline captured facts are committed against a changed server state.
Causal trigger
Connectivity loss during field execution.
Consequence
Divergent state silently merged.
Operational impact
Field believes a decision stands when it does not.
Governance impact
Evidence lineage ambiguous.
Control objective
Divergence produces reconciliation, never automatic overwrite.
Preventive control
Minimum Safe Information Set with governed freshness.
Detective control
RECONCILIATION_REQUIRED preserving both states.
Digital capability
CAP-15 Offline and reconciliation
Functional contract
FC-FPSO-08 + offline model
Decision right
Work Control Process Owner
Candidate source
Readiness layer (owned)
Authoritative source status
UNVALIDATED
Required evidence
Offline reconciliation authority rule (EXT-15) and connectivity profile.
Evidence ID
EV-RSK-13
Competent authority
Corporate Legal + Work Control Process Owner
Closure predicate
Reconciliation authority defined and field connectivity profile evidenced.
Affected BC
BC-08
Affected EXT
EXT-15
Affected gate
G-PH6A
Operational measure
Count of reconciliation events and their resolution latency.
Next action
Close EXT-15; evidence field connectivity profile (BC-08).
RSK-14ConcurrencyConflictCONTAINED NOT CLOSEDRESIDUAL MEDIUMGovernanceAssurance
Current condition
Row-level optimistic concurrency guards implemented (REM-REV0).
Failure mode
Two authorities update the same governed object simultaneously.
Causal trigger
Parallel supervision across shifts or devices.
Consequence
Lost update or contradictory authorization.
Operational impact
Ambiguous release state.
Governance impact
Audit cannot determine which decision governed.
Control objective
No silent overwrite of a governed decision.
Preventive control
Version-guarded writes.
Detective control
Conflict raised to the resolving authority.
Digital capability
CAP-23 Concurrency control
Functional contract
Concurrency guard (REM-REV0)
Decision right
Resolving authority per object
Candidate source
Readiness layer (owned)
Authoritative source status
UNVALIDATED
Required evidence
Named conflict-resolution authority per object class.
Evidence ID
EV-RSK-14
Competent authority
Work Control Process Owner
Closure predicate
Conflict-resolution authority named per governed object class.
Affected BC
BC-03
Affected EXT
EXT-04
Affected gate
G-PH6A
Operational measure
Conflict rate and time to authoritative resolution.
Next action
Record conflict-resolution authorities.
RSK-15EvidenceProvenanceBreakEVIDENCE REQUIREDRESIDUAL HIGHGovernanceAssurance
Current condition
Provenance lineage PRV-01…PRV-18 sealed; operational provenance unproven.
Failure mode
Evidence cannot be traced to actor, authority, version and source.
Causal trigger
Uncontrolled capture path or unbound identity.
Consequence
Evidence inadmissible for reconstruction.
Operational impact
Decision cannot be defended after the fact.
Governance impact
Audit reconstruction terminates at a break.
Control objective
Every material decision reconstructable end to end.
Preventive control
Evidence bound to actor, role, authority basis and version at capture.
Detective control
BROKEN_CHAIN integrity state surfaced.
Digital capability
CAP-24 Evidence and audit reconstruction
Functional contract
Evidence engine (IADA)
Decision right
Data Owner per object
Candidate source
Readiness layer (owned)
Authoritative source status
UNVALIDATED
Required evidence
Data ownership, retention and custody decisions.
Evidence ID
EV-RSK-15
Competent authority
Data Governance Owner
Closure predicate
Ownership, classification, retention and custody issued for governed objects.
Affected BC
BC-05
Affected EXT
EXT-16
Affected gate
G-PH6A
Operational measure
Reconstruction completeness for sampled decisions.
Next action
Issue data governance decisions (BC-05).
RSK-16DataOwnershipAmbiguityEVIDENCE REQUIREDRESIDUAL CRITICALGovernanceAssurance
Current condition
0 of 15 governed objects have validated source authority.
Failure mode
A fact is consumed whose semantic owner is undetermined.
Causal trigger
No object-by-object system-of-record designation.
Consequence
Correct computation over a non-authoritative fact.
Operational impact
Decisions defensible technically but not organizationally.
Governance impact
No accountable owner for the fact.
Control objective
Each governed object has one designated system of record and owner.
Preventive control
Object authority matrix enforced at ingestion.
Detective control
Unvalidated source authority marked and non-releasable.
Digital capability
CAP-26 Source authority governance
Functional contract
22-object authority matrix (Phase 5)
Decision right
Process owner per object
Candidate source
Per-object candidate systems
Authoritative source status
UNVALIDATED
Required evidence
Signed system-of-record designation per object (CD-02).
Evidence ID
EV-RSK-16
Competent authority
Process owner per object
Closure predicate
All pilot-scope objects have a designated and accepted system of record.
Affected BC
BC-01, BC-05
Affected EXT
EXT-01…EXT-09
Affected gate
G-PH6A
Operational measure
Proportion of pilot-scope objects with validated source authority.
Next action
Execute CD-02 object-by-object designation.
RSK-17IAMUncertaintyEVIDENCE REQUIREDRESIDUAL CRITICALGovernanceAssurance
Current condition
Mock IAM only; no corporate authentication mechanism agreed.
Failure mode
Identity is asserted rather than authenticated.
Causal trigger
No corporate IAM integration.
Consequence
Every identity-bound record is unverifiable.
Operational impact
Signatures and confirmations without provable authorship.
Governance impact
The entire authority model rests on an unauthenticated subject.
Control objective
No material decision without authenticated corporate identity.
Preventive control
Unauthenticated identity cannot take material decisions.
Detective control
Identity boundary violations surfaced.
Digital capability
CAP-20 Identity and session
Functional contract
IAM boundary (Phase 5 §IAM)
Decision right
IAM Owner
Candidate source
Corporate IAM
Authoritative source status
UNVALIDATED
Required evidence
IAM architecture confirmation and boundary acceptance.
Evidence ID
EV-RSK-17
Competent authority
IAM Owner
Closure predicate
IAM integration pattern accepted for pilot scope.
Affected BC
BC-02
Affected EXT
EXT-03
Affected gate
G-PH6A
Operational measure
Authentication coverage of material decisions.
Next action
Close EXT-03 with the IAM Owner.
RSK-18FieldPreconditionFailureEVIDENCE REQUIREDRESIDUAL HIGHRiskReduction+TimeReduction
Current condition
Device provisioning, connectivity and field support unevidenced (BC-08).
Failure mode
The field cannot operate the digital control at the point of work.
Causal trigger
No provisioned devices or support coverage during pilot shifts.
Consequence
Reversion to informal practice while the digital record implies control.
Operational impact
Control theatre: record exists, control does not.
Governance impact
Evidence misrepresents actual operational behaviour.
Control objective
Digital control must be operable in the actual field environment.
Preventive control
Field preconditions validated before exposure.
Detective control
Manual continuity path required and observable.
Digital capability
CAP-14 Field operation
Functional contract
FC-FPSO-05 IPERCContinuo / FC-FPSO-06 FieldDeltaAssessment
Decision right
Construction Manager
Candidate source
Corporate IT field services
Authoritative source status
UNVALIDATED
Required evidence
Device provisioning plan, connectivity profile, support coverage commitment.
Evidence ID
EV-RSK-18
Competent authority
Construction Manager + Corporate IT
Closure predicate
Field preconditions evidenced for the pilot location and shifts.
Affected BC
BC-08
Affected EXT
EXT-16, EXT-18
Affected gate
G-PH6A
Operational measure
Device availability and unsupported-shift count.
Next action
Close BC-08 field preconditions.
RSK-19MeasurementBaselineIrreversibilityCONTAINED NOT CLOSEDRESIDUAL CRITICALGovernanceAssurance
Current condition
No prospective BEFORE baseline started; BC-09 protection ACTIVE.
Failure mode
Pilot exposure destroys the ability to measure the prior way of working.
Causal trigger
Any exposure of the new way of working before BEFORE collection starts.
Consequence
Permanent loss of a defensible comparison.
Operational impact
None immediate; the loss is evidential.
Governance impact
Value claims become unverifiable forever.
Control objective
No pilot may consume an undefined irreversible BEFORE baseline.
Preventive control
PilotExposure PROHIBITED until prospective collection is underway.
Detective control
ESC-04 escalation active.
Digital capability
CAP-25 Measurement
Functional contract
Measurement architecture (MPC §29)
Decision right
Project Director
Candidate source
Prospective field observation
Authoritative source status
NOT APPLICABLE
Required evidence
Measurement start record with named measurement owner.
Evidence ID
EV-RSK-19
Competent authority
Project Director
Closure predicate
Prospective BEFORE collection formally started and evidenced.
Affected BC
BC-09
Affected EXT
EXT-14
Affected gate
G-PH6A
Operational measure
Sample count and coverage of the prospective BEFORE dataset.
Next action
Authorize and start the prospective BEFORE measurement.
NO_COMPENSATED_SCORING — residual risk is displayed per risk; no averaged risk index is produced.
§6. Risk-to-Control Quality Check
Detects control/risk/authority/evidence/source anomalies
CONTROL_WITHOUT_RISK
0
RISK_WITHOUT_CONTROL
0
CONTROL_WITHOUT_AUTHORITY
0
CONTROL_WITHOUT_EVIDENCE
0
CONTROL_WITH_UNPROVEN_SOURCE
18
| Risk | Addresses failure mode | Owner identifiable | Authority defined | Source defined | Evidence observable |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RSK-01 | TRUE | TRUE | TRUE | UNKNOWN | TRUE |
| RSK-02 | TRUE | TRUE | TRUE | UNKNOWN | TRUE |
| RSK-03 | TRUE | TRUE | TRUE | UNKNOWN | TRUE |
| RSK-04 | TRUE | TRUE | TRUE | UNKNOWN | TRUE |
| RSK-05 | TRUE | TRUE | TRUE | UNKNOWN | TRUE |
| RSK-06 | TRUE | TRUE | TRUE | UNKNOWN | TRUE |
| RSK-07 | TRUE | TRUE | TRUE | UNKNOWN | TRUE |
| RSK-08 | TRUE | TRUE | TRUE | UNKNOWN | TRUE |
| RSK-09 | TRUE | TRUE | TRUE | UNKNOWN | TRUE |
| RSK-10 | TRUE | TRUE | TRUE | UNKNOWN | TRUE |
| RSK-11 | TRUE | TRUE | TRUE | UNKNOWN | TRUE |
| RSK-12 | TRUE | TRUE | TRUE | UNKNOWN | TRUE |
| RSK-13 | TRUE | TRUE | TRUE | UNKNOWN | TRUE |
| RSK-14 | TRUE | TRUE | TRUE | UNKNOWN | TRUE |
| RSK-15 | TRUE | TRUE | TRUE | UNKNOWN | TRUE |
| RSK-16 | TRUE | TRUE | TRUE | UNKNOWN | TRUE |
| RSK-17 | TRUE | TRUE | TRUE | UNKNOWN | TRUE |
| RSK-18 | TRUE | TRUE | TRUE | UNKNOWN | TRUE |
| RSK-19 | TRUE | TRUE | TRUE | UNKNOWN | TRUE |
CONTROL_WITH_UNPROVEN_SOURCE is the dominant systemic anomaly: the control design is sound but the facts it consumes have no validated authority.
C. 9-BC Closure Register
9 OPEN_BLOCKING · 0 CLOSED · re-derived from current evidence
BC-01Interfaces & source capabilityOPEN BLOCKINGRESIDUAL HIGH
Current condition
No interface capability statement admitted for any pilot-scope source.
Structural exposure
Facts consumed from mock adapters only.
Downstream consequence
Pilot decisions rest on non-operational sources.
Required decision
Confirm interface capability and extract contracts per source.
Competent authority
System owners + Corporate IT
Evidence required
Written interface capability statements
Current evidence
None admitted
Closure predicate
Every pilot-scope source confirms capability and extract contract in writing.
BC-02IAM & decision rightsOPEN BLOCKINGRESIDUAL CRITICAL
Current condition
Mock IAM; 6 of 8 material roles unassigned.
Structural exposure
Authority consumed but not obtainable.
Downstream consequence
All material decision paths fail closed.
Required decision
IAM integration pattern and signed authority register.
Competent authority
IAM Owner + Project Director
Evidence required
IAM confirmation + authority register
Current evidence
None admitted
Closure predicate
Authenticated identity bound to an authoritative decision-rights register.
BC-03Lifecycle & state governanceOPEN BLOCKINGRESIDUAL MEDIUM
Current condition
State models designed, verified and frozen; ownership unevidenced.
Structural exposure
No named owner of lifecycle semantics.
Downstream consequence
State transitions cannot be governed in operation.
Required decision
Assign lifecycle governance ownership per object class.
Competent authority
Work Control Process Owner
Evidence required
Ownership acceptance record
Current evidence
Design evidence only (not admissible for closure)
Closure predicate
Named owner accepts lifecycle and transition governance.
BC-04Stewardship & change governanceOPEN BLOCKINGRESIDUAL HIGH
Current condition
Location steward role defined, party vacant (EXT-12 UNDER_VALIDATION).
Structural exposure
Location and SIMOPS context without an accountable steward.
Downstream consequence
Cumulative exposure decisions unattributable.
Required decision
Appoint the Location data steward (ADR-14).
Competent authority
Project Director
Evidence required
Steward acceptance record
Current evidence
Role definition only
Closure predicate
Named steward accepts the terms of reference in writing.
BC-05Data classification, retention & custodyOPEN BLOCKINGRESIDUAL HIGH
Current condition
Data governance UNVALIDATED.
Structural exposure
Evidence produced without ownership or retention rules.
Downstream consequence
Evidence may be inadmissible or improperly retained.
Required decision
Issue data ownership, classification, retention and custody decisions.
Competent authority
Data Governance Owner + Privacy Officer
Evidence required
Approved data governance decision set
Current evidence
None admitted
Closure predicate
Governance decisions issued for all governed object classes in pilot scope.
BC-06Critical control governanceOPEN BLOCKINGRESIDUAL CRITICAL
Current condition
Critical control SIMULATED; Path A/B decision not taken.
Structural exposure
The non-compensable ES&H gate is fed by a simulated fact.
Downstream consequence
No defensible release decision for fatal-risk work.
Required decision
Path A real integration, or Path B formal rescope with residual risk.
Competent authority
Corporate ES&H
Evidence required
Decision record with DecisionAuthority, Reason, PilotEvidenceLost, ResidualRisk, Phase7Impact
Current evidence
None admitted
Closure predicate
Owner-validated critical-control operating model, or recorded Path B rescope.
BC-07Development & support ownershipOPEN BLOCKINGRESIDUAL HIGH
Current condition
Handover package READY; no receiving corporate delivery organization.
Structural exposure
Unowned baseline decays under enterprise change.
Downstream consequence
No party can sustain or fix the pilot system.
Required decision
Name the delivery organization and support model.
Competent authority
Corporate IT / Digital Delivery
Evidence required
Handover acceptance record + support model
Current evidence
None admitted
Closure predicate
Named organization accepts the handover package and support obligations.
BC-08Field preconditionsOPEN BLOCKINGRESIDUAL HIGH
Current condition
Device provisioning, connectivity and field support unevidenced.
Structural exposure
Digital control may not be operable at the point of work.
Downstream consequence
Control theatre: record without control.
Required decision
Commit provisioning, connectivity and support coverage for pilot shifts.
Competent authority
Construction Manager + Corporate IT
Evidence required
Provisioning plan, connectivity profile, support commitment
Current evidence
None admitted
Closure predicate
Field preconditions evidenced for the pilot location and shift pattern.
BC-09Prospective measurement baselineOPEN BLOCKINGRESIDUAL CRITICAL
Current condition
No prospective BEFORE collection started; protection ACTIVE; ESC-04 open.
Structural exposure
Time-irreversible loss of the comparison opportunity.
Downstream consequence
All later value claims unverifiable.
Required decision
Authorize and start prospective BEFORE measurement before any exposure.
Competent authority
Project Director
Evidence required
Measurement start record with named measurement owner
Current evidence
None admitted
Closure predicate
Prospective BEFORE collection formally underway with defined design.
D. External Dependency Reconciliation
Recounted 18 · new 0 · renumbered 0
Closed
0
Under validation
1
Open
17
Explicitly carried
EXT-15, EXT-16, EXT-17, EXT-18
| ID | Affected capability | Required decision | Competent owner | Closure predicate | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EXT-01 | Document retrieval (CAP-03) | Aconex API availability and extract scope | Corporate Document Control Manager | Documented API capability + agreed extract contract | OPEN |
| EXT-02 | Document authority (CAP-04) | Who holds document-status authority | Document Control Manager | Named authority confirms status semantics | OPEN |
| EXT-03 | Identity & session (CAP-20) | Corporate IAM authentication mechanism | IAM Owner | IAM integration pattern accepted | OPEN |
| EXT-04 | Decision rights (CAP-20) | Source of decision rights and delegation | Project Director + IAM Owner | Authoritative decision-rights register exists | OPEN |
| EXT-05 | Permit / isolation (CAP-18) | Q4/Engica read integration feasibility | Work Control Process Owner | Integration feasibility confirmed in writing | OPEN |
| EXT-06 | Critical control (CAP-17) | Forwood integration or formal rescope (BC06 Path A/B) | Corporate ES&H | Path A evidence or recorded Path B rescope | OPEN |
| EXT-07 | Competency (CAP-08) | Authoritative competency source (ADR-04) | Training & Competency Manager | Source designated and interface agreed | OPEN |
| EXT-08 | Fitness decision (CAP-09) | Minimized fitness fact contract | Occupational Health + Privacy Officer | Privacy-approved fact contract | OPEN |
| EXT-09 | Tool readiness (CAP-12) | Identify tool/equipment system of record | Equipment Manager | System identified with interface capability | OPEN |
| EXT-10 | Signature credential (CAP-13) | Credential / PKI mechanism | Corporate Security | Credential mechanism approved | OPEN |
| EXT-11 | Signature legal sufficiency (CAP-13) | Legal sufficiency of digital signature | Legal Counsel | Legal opinion issued | OPEN |
| EXT-12 | Location stewardship (CAP-02) | Named Location data steward (ADR-14) | Project Director | Named steward accepts terms of reference | UNDER VALIDATION |
| EXT-13 | Restriction authority (CAP-19) | Authoritative restriction system (ADR-03) | Project Controls + ES&H | ADR-03 decided with owner evidence | OPEN |
| EXT-14 | Prospective measurement (CAP-25) | BEFORE measurement baseline start authorization | Project Director | Prospective collection formally underway | OPEN |
| EXT-15 | Offline signature reconciliation (CAP-15) | Authority to reconcile signatures captured offline against a changed object version | Corporate Legal + Work Control Process Owner | Named authority defines offline reconciliation rules and evidence | OPEN |
| EXT-16 | All production capabilities (CAP-26) | Corporate development organization accepting industrialization | Corporate IT / Digital Delivery | Named delivery organization accepts the handover package | OPEN |
| EXT-17 | Security constraints (H-23) | Cybersecurity approval of the target solution pattern | Corporate Cybersecurity | Security review completed with disposition | OPEN |
| EXT-18 | Non-functional requirements (§39) | SLA / SLO / RTO / RPO / retention targets | Service Owner (unassigned) | NFR set issued by competent owner | OPEN |
No new legitimate dependency emerged from operational risk closure; every exposure mapped to an existing EXT ID.
G. Critical Control Realism Assessment
SIMULATED_CRITICAL_CONTROL_MODEL → OWNER_VALIDATED_CRITICAL_CONTROL_OPERATING_MODEL
CRITICAL CONTROL SIMULATIONCONTAINED NOT CLOSEDPILOT BLOCKER RETAINED
| Dimension | Required | Current evidence | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| CriticalControlSource | Named authoritative system for fatal-risk controls | None — Forwood assumed, not confirmed | EVIDENCE REQUIRED |
| ControlOwner | Accountable owner per critical control | None | EVIDENCE REQUIRED |
| VerificationAuthority | Who may declare a control verified and effective | None | EVIDENCE REQUIRED |
| Validity | Verification validity window and expiry semantics | Modelled only | EVIDENCE REQUIRED |
| FieldVerificationMethod | How verification is performed and recorded at the point of work | Prototype method only | EVIDENCE REQUIRED |
| ConflictResolution | Behaviour when field observation contradicts the source | Designed: field loss dominates (fail closed) | CONTAINED |
| EvidenceRequired | Evidence class accepted as proof of control effectiveness | None agreed | EVIDENCE REQUIRED |
| ChangePropagation | How a control status change propagates to active work | Designed: STOP on loss during execution | CONTAINED |
| Escalation | Escalation path on control loss or unavailability | Designed; owner unconfirmed | EVIDENCE REQUIRED |
H. BC-09 Prospective Measurement Baseline
CRITICAL_CONTAINED_NOT_CLOSED · baseline NOT_READY
Once pilot exposure begins without a prospective BEFORE measurement design, a defensible prospective baseline cannot be reconstructed later.
Video status
OPTIONAL_SUPPORTING_MEDIA — never MANDATORY_BASELINE_EVIDENCE
Collection started
FALSE
Owner decisions outstanding
MeasurementOwner, SampleRule
| Element | Definition | Design state |
|---|---|---|
| MeasurementObjective | Quantify friction and control quality in the current pre-start and work-release process, prospectively. | DEFINED |
| ObservationUnit | One job card pre-start cycle at one location for one shift. | DEFINED |
| StartEvent | Supervisor begins preparing the pre-start for the observed job card. | DEFINED |
| EndEvent | Crew is authorized to commence work, or the attempt is abandoned. | DEFINED |
| ContextVariables | Location, discipline, work type, shift, crew size, SIMOPS presence, weather, first-time evolution. | DEFINED |
| ProcessTime | Total elapsed time from StartEvent to EndEvent. | DEFINED |
| SystemTime | Time interacting with any system or paper form. | DEFINED |
| WaitingTime | Time blocked awaiting a decision, document, permit or person. | DEFINED |
| ManualHandlingTime | Time spent on transcription, printing, walking, verbal chasing. | DEFINED |
| ReworkTime | Time re-doing a step invalidated by change or error. | DEFINED |
| ControlValueTime | Time spent on genuine hazard discussion, critical-control challenge and field verification — protected, never counted as waste. | DEFINED |
| ConfoundingFactors | Observer effect, supervisor experience, campaign pressure, seasonal conditions, crew familiarity. | DEFINED |
| MeasurementOwner | Named owner accountable for collection integrity. | OWNER DECISION REQUIRED |
| DataCaptureMethod | Structured prospective observation sheet; video optional supporting media only. | DEFINED |
| SampleRule | Minimum sample per work type and shift, defined before collection starts. | OWNER DECISION REQUIRED |
| ComparabilityRule | BEFORE and PILOT observations matched on work type, location class and shift. | DEFINED |
| AttributionRule | A difference is attributed to the system only when the mechanism is observable; otherwise unattributed. | DEFINED |
Design completeness is not readiness. Readiness requires a named measurement owner, an agreed sample rule and collection formally underway.
§13 Control-value time protection
Preventive-control time is not waste merely because it consumes time. Reduction targets apply only to the reducible list, and only where evidence supports the mechanism.
Protected (never waste)
Hazard discussion · Critical-control challenge · Field verification · Supervisor review · Material reassessment
Reducible only with evidence
RetrievalFriction · RepeatedEntry · Waiting · Navigation · UnnecessaryRework · DuplicateHandling · AvoidableApprovalLatency
I. Evidence Admission Register
NOT_YET_ACQUIRED — 0 OperationalClosureEvidence items admitted
Received
0
Confirmed
0
Supported
0
Contradicted
0
Evidence required
9
| ID | Object | Scope | Owner | Quality | Closure predicate supported | Disposition |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EA-01 | BC-01 | Interfaces & source capability | System owners + Corporate IT | NOT ASSESSABLE | Every pilot-scope source confirms capability and extract contract in writing. | EVIDENCE REQUIRED |
| EA-02 | BC-02 | IAM & decision rights | IAM Owner + Project Director | NOT ASSESSABLE | Authenticated identity bound to an authoritative decision-rights register. | EVIDENCE REQUIRED |
| EA-03 | BC-03 | Lifecycle & state governance | Work Control Process Owner | NOT ASSESSABLE | Named owner accepts lifecycle and transition governance. | EVIDENCE REQUIRED |
| EA-04 | BC-04 | Stewardship & change governance | Project Director | NOT ASSESSABLE | Named steward accepts the terms of reference in writing. | EVIDENCE REQUIRED |
| EA-05 | BC-05 | Data classification, retention & custody | Data Governance Owner + Privacy Officer | NOT ASSESSABLE | Governance decisions issued for all governed object classes in pilot scope. | EVIDENCE REQUIRED |
| EA-06 | BC-06 | Critical control governance | Corporate ES&H | NOT ASSESSABLE | Owner-validated critical-control operating model, or recorded Path B rescope. | EVIDENCE REQUIRED |
| EA-07 | BC-07 | Development & support ownership | Corporate IT / Digital Delivery | NOT ASSESSABLE | Named organization accepts the handover package and support obligations. | EVIDENCE REQUIRED |
| EA-08 | BC-08 | Field preconditions | Construction Manager + Corporate IT | NOT ASSESSABLE | Field preconditions evidenced for the pilot location and shift pattern. | EVIDENCE REQUIRED |
| EA-09 | BC-09 | Prospective measurement baseline | Project Director | NOT ASSESSABLE | Prospective BEFORE collection formally underway with defined design. | EVIDENCE REQUIRED |
Only CONFIRMED evidence, or a combination explicitly sufficient under the closure predicate, may close a blocker.
J. Targeted Revalidation Register
CHANGE_IMPACT_SCOPED_REVALIDATION
| Trigger | Affected requirement | Dependency | BC | Downstream predicate | Not rerun | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IAM architecture confirmation received | Identity & session (CAP-20) | EXT-03 | BC-02 | IAMBoundaryValidatedForPilotScope | Document governance, tool readiness, measurement | ARMED |
| Signed decision-rights register received | Decision rights & delegation | EXT-04 | BC-02 | AuthorityValidatedForPilotScope | SIMOPS aggregation logic, temporal engine | ARMED |
| Document authority confirmation received | Document retrieval & authority | EXT-01, EXT-02 | BC-01 | SourceAuthorityValidatedForPilotScope | Competency, tooling, measurement | ARMED |
| BC-06 Path A evidence or Path B rescope recorded | Critical control (CAP-17) | EXT-06 | BC-06 | CriticalControlGovernanceValidated | Signature governance, offline model | ARMED |
| Location steward acceptance received | Location context & SIMOPS stewardship | EXT-12 | BC-04 | AuthorityValidatedForPilotScope | Document governance, IAM | ARMED |
| Offline signature reconciliation rule issued | Signature applicability & offline reconciliation | EXT-15 | BC-03 | SignatureGovernanceValidatedForPilotScope | Critical control, measurement | ARMED |
| Field provisioning and support commitment received | Field operation preconditions | EXT-16, EXT-18 | BC-08 | FieldPreconditionsValidated | Document governance, authority model | ARMED |
| Prospective BEFORE measurement start recorded | Measurement (CAP-25) | EXT-14 | BC-09 | BC09ProspectiveMeasurementBaselineReady | All assurance domains — measurement start changes no functional predicate | ARMED |
K. G-PH6A Decision
2/12 predicates satisfied — non-compensable
| Predicate | Satisfied | Observed |
|---|---|---|
| CriticalOperationalBlockers = 0 | FALSE | 3 critical blockers open (BC-02, BC-06, BC-09) |
| HighUncontrolledOperationalBlockers = 0 | FALSE | 9 blocking BCs; controlled by fail-closed behaviour but unclosed |
| CriticalControlGovernanceValidated = TRUE | FALSE | SIMULATED_CRITICAL_CONTROL_MODEL; Path A/B undecided |
| AuthorityValidatedForPilotScope = TRUE | FALSE | 6 of 8 material roles unassigned |
| SourceAuthorityValidatedForPilotScope = TRUE | FALSE | 0 of 15 governed objects with validated source authority |
| IAMBoundaryValidatedForPilotScope = TRUE | FALSE | Mock IAM only (EXT-03 OPEN) |
| SignatureGovernanceValidatedForPilotScope = TRUE | FALSE | EXT-10, EXT-11, EXT-15 OPEN |
| DataGovernanceValidatedForPilotScope = TRUE | FALSE | BC-05 UNVALIDATED |
| FieldPreconditionsValidated = TRUE | FALSE | BC-08 UNVALIDATED |
| BC09ProspectiveMeasurementBaselineReady = TRUE | FALSE | NOT_READY; collection not started |
| SafeFallbackDefined = TRUE | TRUE | Manual continuity path defined; technology failure cannot remove required ES&H control |
| PilotStopCriteriaDefined = TRUE | TRUE | Stop criteria defined in the pilot control principles (not yet authorized for use) |
G-PH6A HOLDPhase6A HOLDControlledPilot NOT AUTHORIZEDPilotExposure PROHIBITEDHARD STOP
Non-compensable: 2 satisfied predicates do not offset 10 unsatisfied ones.
L–Q. Controlled Pilot, Pilot Evidence and Pilot Assurance
Not executed — hard stop enforced
| Section | Item | Status | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| D5 §16 | PH6A-FPSO-PILOT-BASELINE-REV0 | NOT CREATED | Entry condition G-PH6A = PASS not met. Creating a frozen pilot baseline now would imply an authorization that does not exist. |
| D5 §17–19 | Controlled pilot execution and value measurement | NOT EXECUTED | PilotExposure = PROHIBITED; BC-09 prospective baseline not started. |
| D6 §20–22 | Independent pilot assurance and G-FPSO-09 | NOT EVALUABLE | No pilot executed. Pilot execution is not pilot acceptance, and no pilot exists to assess. |
| D6 §23 | Pilot risk reduction assessment | NOT AVAILABLE | No observed pilot behaviour exists; no control effectiveness may be claimed. |
| M / N | Pilot evidence register and BEFORE-vs-PILOT measurement | NOT AVAILABLE | Neither BEFORE nor PILOT datasets exist. |
HumanAuthority
Every material authorization remains a human act with resolved authority. — DEFINED_NOT_ACTIVE
ManualContinuityWhereRequired
A manual path remains available for every mandatory ES&H control. — DEFINED_NOT_ACTIVE
FailSafeBehaviour
Unverifiable mandatory fact → HOLD. — DEFINED_NOT_ACTIVE
NoAutonomousAuthorization
No rule or AI output may authorize work. — DEFINED_NOT_ACTIVE
ExplicitSourceBoundary
Source ownership and write authority displayed at point of use. — DEFINED_NOT_ACTIVE
AuditTrail
Every decision reconstructable to actor, authority, version and source. — DEFINED_NOT_ACTIVE
Rollback
Immediate reversion to the current way of working without loss of control. — DEFINED_NOT_ACTIVE
IncidentEscalation
Defined escalation on any control, authority or evidence failure. — DEFINED_NOT_ACTIVE
TechnologyFailureNeverRemovesControl
Technology failure cannot remove a required ES&H control. — DEFINED_NOT_ACTIVE
G-FPSO-09 NOT EVALUABLEPilotAssurance NOT STARTED
No pilot has been executed. Evaluating this gate on simulation evidence would promote SimulationEvidence into PilotEvidence.
- · CriticalPilotFindings = 0
- · HighUncontrolledPilotFindings = 0
- · ControlIntegrityViolations = 0
- · AuthorityViolations = 0
- · ReachableIllegalMaterialStates = 0
- · UncontrolledSourceFailures = 0
- · UncontrolledRecoveryFailures = 0
- · EvidenceIntegrityBreaks = 0
- · MeasurementIntegrity = ACCEPTABLE
- · ResidualRiskWithinAuthorizedPilotExitBoundary = TRUE
R. Residual Risk Register
Pre-pilot exposure; no control effectiveness observed
No risk is claimed as zero. Every residual exposure below is pre-pilot and unreduced by operational evidence; design containment is not risk reduction.
| Risk | Domain | Pre-pilot exposure | Observed pilot behaviour | Control triggered | Effectiveness | Residual | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RSK-01 | TemporalDecoherence | MEDIUM | NOT_OBSERVED — no pilot executed | NOT_OBSERVED | UNPROVEN_IN_OPERATION | MEDIUM | EV-RSK-01 |
| RSK-02 | RevisionDecoherence | HIGH | NOT_OBSERVED — no pilot executed | NOT_OBSERVED | UNPROVEN_IN_OPERATION | HIGH | EV-RSK-02 |
| RSK-03 | ApplicabilityAmbiguity | MEDIUM | NOT_OBSERVED — no pilot executed | NOT_OBSERVED | UNPROVEN_IN_OPERATION | MEDIUM | EV-RSK-03 |
| RSK-04 | AuthorityLeakage | CRITICAL | NOT_OBSERVED — no pilot executed | NOT_OBSERVED | UNPROVEN_IN_OPERATION | CRITICAL | EV-RSK-04 |
| RSK-05 | DecisionRightExpiry | HIGH | NOT_OBSERVED — no pilot executed | NOT_OBSERVED | UNPROVEN_IN_OPERATION | HIGH | EV-RSK-05 |
| RSK-06 | SignatureVersionMismatch | HIGH | NOT_OBSERVED — no pilot executed | NOT_OBSERVED | UNPROVEN_IN_OPERATION | HIGH | EV-RSK-06 |
| RSK-07 | CriticalControlSourceUncertainty | CRITICAL | NOT_OBSERVED — no pilot executed | NOT_OBSERVED | UNPROVEN_IN_OPERATION | CRITICAL | EV-RSK-07 |
| RSK-08 | SIMOPSAggregation | HIGH | NOT_OBSERVED — no pilot executed | NOT_OBSERVED | UNPROVEN_IN_OPERATION | HIGH | EV-RSK-08 |
| RSK-09 | LocationContextMismatch | HIGH | NOT_OBSERVED — no pilot executed | NOT_OBSERVED | UNPROVEN_IN_OPERATION | HIGH | EV-RSK-09 |
| RSK-10 | Crew/CompetencyMismatch | HIGH | NOT_OBSERVED — no pilot executed | NOT_OBSERVED | UNPROVEN_IN_OPERATION | HIGH | EV-RSK-10 |
| RSK-11 | Tool/EquipmentValidity | MEDIUM | NOT_OBSERVED — no pilot executed | NOT_OBSERVED | UNPROVEN_IN_OPERATION | MEDIUM | EV-RSK-11 |
| RSK-12 | CorporateSourceUnavailable | HIGH | NOT_OBSERVED — no pilot executed | NOT_OBSERVED | UNPROVEN_IN_OPERATION | HIGH | EV-RSK-12 |
| RSK-13 | OfflineReconciliation | HIGH | NOT_OBSERVED — no pilot executed | NOT_OBSERVED | UNPROVEN_IN_OPERATION | HIGH | EV-RSK-13 |
| RSK-14 | ConcurrencyConflict | MEDIUM | NOT_OBSERVED — no pilot executed | NOT_OBSERVED | UNPROVEN_IN_OPERATION | MEDIUM | EV-RSK-14 |
| RSK-15 | EvidenceProvenanceBreak | HIGH | NOT_OBSERVED — no pilot executed | NOT_OBSERVED | UNPROVEN_IN_OPERATION | HIGH | EV-RSK-15 |
| RSK-16 | DataOwnershipAmbiguity | CRITICAL | NOT_OBSERVED — no pilot executed | NOT_OBSERVED | UNPROVEN_IN_OPERATION | CRITICAL | EV-RSK-16 |
| RSK-17 | IAMUncertainty | CRITICAL | NOT_OBSERVED — no pilot executed | NOT_OBSERVED | UNPROVEN_IN_OPERATION | CRITICAL | EV-RSK-17 |
| RSK-18 | FieldPreconditionFailure | HIGH | NOT_OBSERVED — no pilot executed | NOT_OBSERVED | UNPROVEN_IN_OPERATION | HIGH | EV-RSK-18 |
| RSK-19 | MeasurementBaselineIrreversibility | CRITICAL | NOT_OBSERVED — no pilot executed | NOT_OBSERVED | UNPROVEN_IN_OPERATION | CRITICAL | EV-RSK-19 |
S. Master Gate Register Update
All historical decisions preserved
| Gate | Title | Decision | Origin |
|---|---|---|---|
| G-FPSO-01 | Architecture Impact Assessment | PASS | PH6A-FPSO-AIA-REV0 |
| G-FPSO-02 | Functional Contract Definition | PASS | PH6A-FPSO-FCD-REV0 |
| G-FPSO-03 | Contract Assurance & Baseline Freeze | PASS | PH6A-FPSO-FCA-REV0 |
| G-FPSO-04 | Design-to-Contract Conformance | PASS | PH6A-FPSO-IAD-REV2 |
| G-FPSO-04B | Bechtelized Application Conformance | PASS | PH6A-FPSO-BAC-REV0 |
| G-FPSO-05 | Implementation Conformance | PASS | PH6A-FPSO-ICV-REV0 |
| G-FPSO-06 | Scenario Baseline Freeze | PASS | PH6A-FPSO-MPB-REV0 |
| G-FPSO-07 | Demonstrator Acceptance | PASS | PH6A-FPSO-DAA-REV0 |
| G-FPSO-08 | Corporate Development Handover Readiness | PASS | PH6A-FPSO-MPC-REV0 |
| G-PH6A | Phase 6A Operational Revalidation | HOLD | PH6A-FPSO-MPC-REV0 |
| G-PILOT | Controlled Pilot Gate | NOT EVALUABLE | PH6A-FPSO-MPC-REV0 |
| G-PH7 | Production Readiness | NOT EVALUABLE | PH6A-FPSO-MPC-REV0 |
| G-HANDOVER | Operational Handover Gate | NOT EVALUABLE | PH6A-FPSO-MPC-REV0 |
| G-OEC | Operational Evidence Closure | HOLD | PH6A-FPSO-FPD-REV0 |
| G-PH6A | Phase 6A Entry Predicate (re-evaluated under FPD) | HOLD | PH6A-FPSO-FPD-REV0 |
| G-PILOT-BASELINE | Pilot Baseline Freeze | NOT CREATED | PH6A-FPSO-FPD-REV0 |
| G-FPSO-09 | Pilot Assurance & Acceptance | NOT EVALUABLE | PH6A-FPSO-FPD-REV0 |
Discipline & Regression Tests
20/20 PASS
| ID | Statement | Result | Basis |
|---|---|---|---|
| FPD-R01 | Entry condition independently reconstructed, not inherited | PASS | 14/14 entry values recomputed from MPC exports. |
| FPD-R02 | No architecture or functional baseline change introduced | PASS | No admitted evidence proved a design defect. |
| FPD-R03 | Master matrix covers every mandated risk family | PASS | 19 risk families reconciled; no risk invented to populate the register. |
| FPD-R04 | Every risk carries a control, an authority and an observable closure predicate | PASS | Quality check executed per risk row. |
| FPD-R05 | CONTROL_WITH_UNPROVEN_SOURCE is surfaced rather than suppressed | PASS | 18 risks depend on an unvalidated source. |
| FPD-R06 | All 9 BCs reconstructed from current evidence, not historical labels | PASS | Each BC re-derived from admitted evidence (0 items). |
| FPD-R07 | External dependency count recounted with no renumbering | PASS | 18 dependencies; EXT-15…EXT-18 explicitly retained. |
| FPD-R08 | No blocker closed without CONFIRMED evidence | PASS | 0 confirmed evidence items, 0 closures. |
| FPD-R09 | Revalidation is change-impact scoped | PASS | Each trigger names the domains not rerun. |
| FPD-R10 | Critical control treated as CONTAINED_NOT_CLOSED | PASS | Target operating model not reached; pilot blocker retained. |
| FPD-R11 | BC-09 treated as time-irreversible and not closed by design | PASS | Measurement design defined; collection not started. |
| FPD-R12 | Video is not treated as mandatory baseline evidence | PASS | Capture method is structured prospective observation. |
| FPD-R13 | Control-value time protected from waste classification | PASS | 5 protected categories; reduction targets restricted to 7 evidenced friction types. |
| FPD-R14 | G-PH6A evaluated non-compensably | PASS | 2/12 predicates satisfied; no averaging. |
| FPD-R15 | Hard stop enforced after G-PH6A HOLD | PASS | D5 and D6 not executed; no pilot baseline created. |
| FPD-R16 | No synthetic pilot, measurement or assurance result generated | PASS | Pilot registers marked NOT_AVAILABLE rather than populated. |
| FPD-R17 | Residual risk remains visible and non-zero | PASS | No control effectiveness claimed without observation. |
| FPD-R18 | Master gate register preserves all historical decisions | PASS | Historical gates carried unchanged; 4 new entries appended. |
| FPD-R19 | Evidence discipline separations enforced | PASS | Simulation, handover, prototype, mock source and design all held apart from operational acceptance. |
| FPD-R20 | Highest evidence class unchanged at SIMULATION_EVIDENCE | PASS | No operational or pilot evidence admitted in this prompt. |
T. Final Status & Next Authorized Action
Current state, not desired future state
FINAL_PROMPT_D
OPERATIONAL_RISK_CLOSURE_DEFINED_EVIDENCE_PENDING_PILOT_NOT_AUTHORIZED
PromptID
PH6A-FPSO-FPD-REV0
RiskControlEvidenceMatrix
CREATED
ExternalDependencyCount
18
ExternalDependenciesClosed
0
BlockingBCCount
9
CriticalFindingsOpen
2
OperationalClosureEvidenceStatus
NOT_YET_ACQUIRED — 0 OperationalClosureEvidence items admitted
BC09ProspectiveBaseline
NOT_READY
G-PH6A
HOLD
Phase6A
HOLD
ControlledPilot
NOT_AUTHORIZED
PilotExposure
PROHIBITED
PilotAssurance
NOT_STARTED
G-FPSO-09
NOT_EVALUABLE
HighestEvidenceClass
SIMULATION_EVIDENCE
PromptE_Authorized
FALSE
NextAuthorizedAction
Acquire OperationalClosureEvidence against the 9 blocking BCs — starting with EXT-03/EXT-04 (authority and IAM), the BC-06 critical-control Path A/B decision, and Project Director authorization to start the prospective BEFORE measurement. No pilot exposure until BC-09 collection is underway.