IRPizarra de Preinicio · PRJ-4820 / Área 300 / Turno Día A

Pizarra Contexto de trabajo Documentos y registros Controles críticos Registros Preparación Condiciones bloqueantes Autorización

Aseguramiento / Técnico

SecundarioEvidencia Gestión del cambio Aseguramiento continuo (demo)Medición / valor Aseguramiento ejecutivo

Readiness & operations (preserved)Shift Readiness Assurance Field Mode Authority Measurement Integration & Ops Configuration Locations & SIMOPS

Phases & gatesPhase 1 Prototype Acceptance Gate Option Decision Technical Definition Controlled Pilot Phase 6A Readiness Production Readiness G-PH6A Gate Readiness Closure

Architecture & baselinesArchitecture Architecture Hardening Integrated Baseline Design Seal Interaction Architecture H–AE Basis 0C Register Preservation Overlay Temporal Compliance

Field pre-start engineeringField Pre-Start AIA Pre-Start Contracts Pre-Start Interaction Macro A Engineering Macro B Demonstrator Macro C Industrialization

Evidence & closure workstreamsClosure Workstream Mesa 1 Enablement Mesa 1 Closure Package Mesa 1 Execution Mesa 2 Governance Mesa 3 Field Evidence Workstream Evidence Board Request Execution Pack Wave 1 Kickoff OER-03 BC-09 Capture S1 Owner Engagement Owner Evidence Intake BC / EXT Ledger

Independent assurance & simulationIndependent Assurance Review Finding Remediation Independent Retest Simulation Campaign Evidence Engine Test 01 Red Team Test 01 REV2 Hardening Audit Ledger

Industrialization & closeoutOperational Risk Closure Final Closure Execution Final Integration A Final Integration B Assurance Summary Pilot CV-07 Pilot Assurance Executive Assurance Executive Demo REV3 UX Hierarchy Alignment Consolidación REV5 Alineamiento UX REV6

Phase 3 · multidisciplinary acceptance · read-only

Integrated Acceptance Gate

Consumes the accepted Phase 1 Prototype, Phase 2 Verification and Phase 2A Closure evidence. No redesign performed. Reviewer challenges are recorded as findings and routed to the competent design authority; no accepted baseline is reopened. No platform, product or application is selected at this gate.

H — Final Integrated Disposition

ACCEPT WITH CONTROLLED ACTIONS

The capability is operationally credible, governable, supportable in principle, compatible with the enterprise landscape as a bounded decision layer, and usable in field execution for the intended decision. It is suitable to proceed to an enterprise solution decision. Progression is conditioned on the six High controlled actions, none of which reopens an accepted baseline.

· P3-EA-01 — staff ADR-14 stewardship roles to funded enterprise positions
· P3-EA-02 — close ADR-03 and CA-03 object-level authority at the option decision
· P3-ESH-01 / P3-IT-02 — close ADR-13 / CA-01 identity and IAM binding before any real authorization is recorded
· P3-IT-01 — demonstrate offline capture with fail-closed stale-context handling and deterministic reconciliation
· P3-TRN-01 — fund the organizational change workstream

Next hold point — Integrated Acceptance Gate → Enterprise Business / Architecture Option Decision

NOT TAKEN. No platform, product or application (Q4, Smart Completions, new build or otherwise) is selected or implied at this gate.

CRITICAL findings

HIGH findings

MEDIUM findings

LOW findings

Confirmations

B — Domain-by-domain acceptance register

Acceptance question

Would a Superintendent trust this model to understand why work can or cannot start?

YES, with controlled actions. Workface readiness, Job Card preparation, lookahead, multi-discipline coordination, SIMOPS, blocker attribution and location continuity are all demonstrated with causal explanation rather than status colour. The Superintendent sees which condition blocks which Job Card, who owns it and by when — not an aggregated score.

Evidence reviewed

· /p1/shift — 24/48/72 h lookahead over JC-7701/7702/7703
· /p1/location — LOC-3100-CONC-CV07-TT01 concurrent work set + blocker attribution (F-02 closure)
· /p1/jobcard/JC-7701 — DecisionExplanation and determinant list
· Phase 2 VJ-01…VJ-04; Phase 2A 2A-02 closure

P3-CON-01OPERATIONALMEDIUM

Administrative friction reduction is asserted through the prototype's prepopulation model but has not been measured against the current manual preparation cycle (no baseline time-on-task).

Required action: Establish a preparation-cycle baseline (time to prepare and authorize a Job Card today vs with the capability) before enterprise business case sign-off.
Competent owner: Construction Manager with Project Controls
Architecture impact: None — measurement only.
Operational impact: Adoption argument remains qualitative until measured; does not affect decision correctness.
Residual risk: MEDIUM / CONTROLLED

P3-CON-02OPERATIONALMEDIUM

Reassessment scope after change is demonstrated on a bounded change; the unbounded-change path routes to broader reassessment but the field re-preparation workload of that path is untested at crew scale.

Required action: Run a field trial of the unbounded-change reassessment path across a full shift population before deployment.
Competent owner: Construction Manager with ES&H
Architecture impact: None — selective vs broad reassessment semantics remain as accepted.
Operational impact: Potential shift-start congestion if broad reassessment triggers frequently.
Residual risk: MEDIUM / CONTROLLED

Cross-functional challenge scenarios walked with reviewers

ID	Scenario	Evidence	Observed behaviour	Verdict	Findings
CS-01	Clean READY Job Card	JC-7703 preparation path with all preventive items HUMAN_CONFIRMED	READY is reached only after every applicable item is confirmed with attributable evidence; readiness is never asserted from source-system status alone.	CREDIBLE	—
CS-02	Critical-control HOLD	JC-7702 critical control with UNVERIFIABLE verification state	HOLD with the specific control named, owner attributed and required action stated; no compensation from other satisfied dimensions.	CREDIBLE	—
CS-03	Cumulative SIMOPS STOP	WS-2026-09-03-TT01 (CUM-4) and coverage set WS-…-COVERAGE (CUM-2/5/7)	Pairwise PASS with location STOP; competent SIMOPS authority attempt denied with NonCompensableStop and sideEffect NONE.	CREDIBLE	—
CS-04	Competency expiry inside the planned window	Crew competency expiring mid-window on the electrical Job Card	CurrentReadiness and ForecastReadiness diverge; the forecast degradation is explained by the expiring credential and its owner, not by a generic risk score.	CREDIBLE	P3-PC-01
CS-05	Location continuity between disciplines	LOC-3100-CONC-CV07-TT01 conditions inherited to discipline work contexts	Context inherits with applicability revalidation and provenance; authorization never inherits — the hard non-inheritable list holds.	CREDIBLE	—
CS-06	Q4 unknown / unmapped state	Unmapped Q4 safety-document state in the interaction set	Fails closed to UNVERIFIABLE / STOP via CUM-7 rather than being inferred to a nearest known state.	CREDIBLE WITH FINDING	P3-EA-02
CS-07	Unavailable stewardship authority	LOC-3100-CONC-CV08 with WRITE_AUTHORITY and ISOLATION_AUTHORITY vacant	AuthorityResolutionState UNRESOLVED, capabilities DISABLED_SAFE, no alternate actor assumes authority, unrelated Job Cards unaffected.	CREDIBLE WITH FINDING	P3-EA-01
CS-08	Selective reassessment after change	Bounded change to a single preventive determinant	Only affected confirmations are invalidated; unaffected confirmations retain their evidence and version pin.	CREDIBLE	—
CS-09	Unbounded change requiring broader reassessment	Location context version increment affecting multiple disciplines	Broad reassessment is triggered and prior confirmations are demoted to SYSTEM_PROPOSED rather than silently carried forward.	CREDIBLE WITH FINDING	P3-CON-02
CS-10	Concurrent mechanical / electrical / instrumentation work in one Location	JC-7701 (MECH) / JC-7702 (ELEC) / JC-7703 (INST) in TT01	One governed operational context with three discipline work contexts; blockers attributed per Job Card; control ownership stays with the Job Card.	CREDIBLE	P3-FLD-01

C — Cross-functional conflict register

Positions are not averaged. No voting or weighted score may override a mandatory control or authority boundary.

CF-01Whether a competent SIMOPS authority may disposition a cumulative STOP to protect the shift plan

Position A

Construction: a qualified SIMOPS Coordinator on site should be able to disposition a cumulative STOP with compensating measures, otherwise the shift plan collapses.

Position B

ES&H: cumulative STOP is non-compensable by accepted rule; dispositioning it converts a mandatory control into a negotiated one.

Underlying decision right: Mandatory control integrity (no-compensation rule)
Competent authority: ES&H Authority — mandatory control boundary
Evidence required: None. The rule is an accepted invariant, not an open question.

Disposition — POSITION B UPHELD. No averaging. Cumulative STOP remains non-compensable. Construction's operational concern is redirected to earlier planning: the STOP must be designed out in the lookahead, not dispositioned at the workface. Recorded as P3-CON-02 planning action, not as a rule change.

CF-02Who masters Location canonical identity in the enterprise landscape

Position A

Enterprise Architecture: minimize canonical assets; consider mastering location in an existing enterprise system to avoid a new register.

Position B

Construction and ES&H: no existing system represents the operational context container required for SIMOPS and inheritance with the necessary governance.

Underlying decision right: Canonical representation and lifecycle ownership
Competent authority: Enterprise Architecture with the Location Governance Authority
Evidence required: Object-level capability comparison of candidate enterprise registers against ADR-14 Option C requirements.

Disposition — DEFERRED TO THE NEXT GATE. ADR-14 Option C stands as accepted for the capability; the platform/mastering decision belongs to the Enterprise Business / Architecture Option Decision, not to this acceptance review. Recorded as P3-EA-01.

CF-03Whether offline field execution may record an authorization while disconnected

Position A

Field operations: coverage at the workface is unreliable; confirmations must be recordable offline or the model is unusable.

Position B

IT/IM and ES&H: an authorization recorded against a context that cannot be verified as current breaches fail-closed and evidence integrity.

Underlying decision right: Authority and evidence integrity under degraded connectivity
Competent authority: ES&H Authority with IT/IM (design authority for offline semantics)
Evidence required: Demonstrated offline journey with stale-context detection and deterministic reconnect reconciliation.

Disposition — NOT RESOLVED AT THIS GATE — routed as P3-IT-01 (High). Interim rule preserved: offline may capture, offline may never authorize against unverifiable context. No voting override permitted.

CF-04Whether governance vocabulary should be replaced in field views

Position A

Field operations: DISABLED_SAFE / SEMANTIC_PROPOSAL are unusable terms at the workface.

Position B

Enterprise Architecture and ES&H: recorded state names are evidence; renaming them fragments traceability.

Underlying decision right: Recorded state semantics vs presentation
Competent authority: Design authority (presentation layer) — state semantics unchanged
Evidence required: Field comprehension test of the proposed lexicon.

Disposition — BOTH POSITIONS SATISFIED WITHOUT COMPROMISE OF THE INVARIANT: recorded state names remain canonical; a presentation lexicon is authorized as a controlled action (P3-FLD-01). This is not averaging — the invariant is untouched.

CF-05Whether readiness forecast constitutes a competing schedule

Position A

Project Controls: any forward-looking readiness statement risks being cited as a schedule position.

Position B

Construction: without forecast readiness the lookahead cannot be prepared preventively.

Underlying decision right: Schedule authority
Competent authority: Project Controls — schedule remains sole schedule authority
Evidence required: Forecast labelling bound to the consumed schedule version.

Disposition — POSITION A UPHELD ON AUTHORITY, POSITION B PRESERVED ON FUNCTION: forecast readiness continues, explicitly labelled as a readiness projection against a named schedule version, never as a date. Recorded as P3-PC-01.

Acceptance criteria assessment

Criterion	Status	Basis
No unresolved Critical finding exists	MET	Zero Critical findings raised across the eight review domains.
No unresolved High finding undermines a structural invariant	MET	Six High findings (P3-ESH-01, P3-EA-01, P3-EA-02, P3-IT-01, P3-IT-02, P3-TRN-01). Each is a deployment or enterprise-decision precondition; none contradicts a frozen invariant, and each maps to an already-visible controlled-open ADR or a funded-action requirement.
No review domain identifies an uncontrolled parallel system of record	MET	P3-EA-03 confirms no write-back, no date origination, no permit issuance, no progress claim. The single canonical asset (Location) is deliberately governed under ADR-14 Option C.
Authority remains defensible	MET	Behavioural gating demonstrated with zero unauthorized side effects; enterprise identity binding routed to ADR-13 / CA-01 as a precondition of real authorization.
No-compensation remains intact	MET	CF-01 upheld without averaging; NonCompensableStop denials recorded for competent authority attempts.
Location / SIMOPS behaviour remains operationally credible	MET	CS-03, CS-05, CS-07, CS-10 judged credible; cumulative rules CUM-2/4/5/6/7 exercised; pairwise PASS never implies location PASS.
Field usability is adequate for the intended decision	MET	Decision clarity, blocker identification and proposal-vs-confirmation distinction adequate; two Medium usability actions (P3-FLD-01, P3-FLD-02) carried.
Enterprise implementation appears technically feasible	MET	Read-oriented federation, pinned decisions and append-only evidence are industrializable; offline and IAM carried as High preconditions, not as feasibility blockers.
Controlled Open ADRs remain explicitly visible	MET	ADR-03, ADR-13/CA-01, ADR-15, ADR-16, ADR-17…ADR-24, CA-03, CA-04 remain open and surfaced; none silently resolved during acceptance.