PizarraContexto de trabajoDocumentos y registrosControles críticosRegistrosPreparaciónCondiciones bloqueantesAutorización
Aseguramiento / Técnico
Phase 1 prototype · Phase 2A corrective verification · SYNTHETIC DEMONSTRATION DATA

Integrated Preventive Readiness

Hold point — Phase 3 not authorized
Acting role — demonstration device only, not an authorization mechanism

Superintendent: What will be ready across my area, and what must be resequenced?

Role journeys

No universal 24-tab surface — each role sees only its decision scope

Supervisor / Field

Can my crew start, and if not, who owns the blocker?

Journey
  1. Open shift lookahead filtered to own crew and location
  2. Open Job Card → enabling conditions and missing items only
  3. Confirm or reject SYSTEM_PROPOSED preventive package items in the field
  4. Run IPERC Continuo field confirmation before execution
  5. Escalate blocker to named owner — never self-release
May confirm
  • · IPERC field hazard confirmation
  • · Preventive package item confirmation
  • · Sign-on record
May not
  • · Authorize PETAR
  • · Override SIMOPS STOP
  • · Change canonical location structure
Open landing view

Superintendent

ACTING

What will be ready across my area, and what must be resequenced?

Journey
  1. Shift + 72h lookahead across all disciplines
  2. Location operational context → concurrent work set
  3. Review cumulative SIMOPS determinants and resequencing options
  4. Assign blocker owners and required-by dates
May confirm
  • · Blocker ownership assignment
  • · Sequence change request
May not
  • · Confirm ES&H critical control adequacy
  • · Release expired competency
  • · Authorize isolation
Open landing view

ES&H

Are critical controls and risk context valid for what is actually happening there?

Journey
  1. Location Critical Risk Context and SIMOPS interaction risk
  2. IPERC Continuo — predicted vs field-confirmed hazards
  3. Critical control verification status and Life Critical exposure
  4. PETAR review routing (review ≠ authorization)
May confirm
  • · Critical control verification
  • · IPERC review
  • · PETAR technical review
May not
  • · Grant work authorization
  • · Waive a mandatory control
  • · Edit canonical location register
Open landing view

Functional Owner

Are the requirements in my discipline correctly applied and current?

Journey
  1. Applicability decisions produced by PACE for own requirement family
  2. Requirement version pinning and supersession impact
  3. Unclassified requirement queue (fails closed until classified)
May confirm
  • · Requirement classification
  • · Applicability exception with evidence
May not
  • · Authorize work
  • · Approve SIMOPS
  • · Assign stewardship roles
Open landing view

Project Controls

What is the forecast readiness of the plan, and what is at risk?

Journey
  1. Forecast readiness across the execution window
  2. Expiry horizon: competencies, certificates, permits, documents
  3. Blocker ageing and ownership
May confirm
  • · Required-by date
  • · Plan alignment note
May not
  • · Change readiness verdicts
  • · Confirm controls
  • · Authorize work
Open landing view

Management Assurance

Can any decision be reconstructed exactly as it was made?

Journey
  1. Decision register with pinned inputs and versions
  2. Evidence chain: source, version, decision, owner, history
  3. Prototype Review Register and open ADRs
May confirm
  • · Assurance observation
  • · Finding disposition (recommendation only)
May not
  • · Alter pinned decisions
  • · Delete evidence
  • · Authorize work
Open landing view

Governance Administrator

Is the governance configuration complete, and where is it failing closed?

Journey
  1. Stewardship role assignment per location
  2. Mapping states and unresolved federation identities
  3. Classification governance (no hard-coded criticality)
  4. Inheritance policy configuration
May confirm
  • · Stewardship assignment
  • · Mapping validation
  • · Inheritance policy
May not
  • · Authorize work
  • · Confirm field hazards
  • · Bypass DISABLED_SAFE
Open landing view

Role selection is a demonstration device. It does not grant, imply or substitute operational authority.